Skip to content
Frameworks and regulations

NIS2

The EU's cybersecurity directive for essential and important entities — who it catches, what it asks for, and which of it lands in Vendorica.

Updated

Directive (EU) 2022/2555 — NIS2 — has applied since 17 October 2024, when Member States were required to have transposed it. It replaces NIS1 and covers a much wider population: energy, transport, banking, health, water, digital infrastructure, public administration, postal services, waste, food, manufacturing, digital providers and research.

Two questions decide it, and neither is about what you think of yourself:

  1. Sector. Annex I lists essential sectors, Annex II important ones.
  2. Size. Broadly, medium-sized and above — with exceptions that catch small entities anyway where they are a sole provider or critical to society.

The essential/important split does not change the security obligations much; it changes supervision. Essential entities get proactive supervision; important ones are supervised after the fact, when something suggests they should be.

Article 21 is the heart of it — cybersecurity risk-management measures, proportionate to the risk. The ten families it names map onto the registers you already keep:

Article 21(2) measure Where it lives
Risk analysis and information-system security policies Risk registers, Policies
Incident handling Incidents
Business continuity, backup, crisis management Controls and their evidence
Supply-chain security The vendor register, contracts
Security in acquisition, development and maintenance Controls
Policies to assess effectiveness Control tests
Cyber hygiene and training Training
Cryptography and encryption Controls
HR security, access control, asset management Access reviews, assets
MFA, secured communications, emergency comms Controls

Article 23 is the reporting obligation, and it is the one with a clock: an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident, an incident notification within 72 hours, and a final report within one month.

Article 20 puts it on management. Governing bodies approve the measures and can be held liable, and they are required to follow training. That is worth reading twice if your programme has no board-level artefact — a report on a cadence is the cheapest way to create one.

Adopt NIS2 from Compliance → Frameworks the way you would any framework; see Adopting a framework. Vendorica carries the directive as citations at article and paragraph level, so a control maps to Art. 21(2)(d) rather than to “supply chain” in general — which is what makes the mapping defensible when someone asks why you consider a requirement met.

Then you have probably noticed the overlap, and DORA mostly wins: for a financial entity, DORA is lex specialis — Article 4 of NIS2 defers to sector-specific Union acts where their requirements are at least equivalent. In practice that means your ICT risk management, incident reporting and third-party rules follow DORA, and NIS2 may still reach parts of your group that DORA does not.

Vendorica does not decide that for you. It lets one control satisfy both citations, which is the shape you want when your answer to a supervisor is “the same control, evidenced once”.